This essay challenges mainstream perceptions of Russia as an existential threat to Germany by uncovering the psychological and structural mechanisms behind modern geopolitical tension. It explores how recognition-seeking behavior among political and military actors—amplified through delegation and media—leads to misinterpreted symbolic actions and unnecessary escalation. Rather than preparing for war, many hybrid actions serve internal loyalty performances. The text offers an alternative path based on trust-building, silent diplomacy, and mutually beneficial cooperation, particularly as BRICS nations begin to erode U.S. global hegemony.

Tiếp tục đọc

A vague warning from Germany’s intelligence chief about Russia’s possible deployment of “little green men” triggered a full-spectrum performance across NATO institutions, media outlets, and political arenas. This essay dissects how modern decision-making is less about structural strategy and more about symbolic recognition—where intelligence, media, and governments amplify each other in a loop of performative escalation. Through the lens of Eidoism, we reveal how even ghostly threats can become real when every actor seeks visibility over form.

Tiếp tục đọc

Narva, Estonia, sits at the crossroads of Europe’s security dilemmas. While a Russian invasion is unlikely, the city’s vulnerability makes it an ideal site for hybrid “tests” aimed at probing and undermining Western unity. Game theory and Eidoism’s analysis reveal how cycles of recognition-seeking, domestic performance, and structural distrust drive the persistence of crisis—even when form-based diplomacy offers a better path.

Tiếp tục đọc

lên đầu trang
vi