The Eidoist Global Salary Model and the Future of Migration
The Migration-Prosperity Paradox
Across the globe, migration is rising. Yet instead of asking why people move, Western nations invest in walls, border drones, and detention centers. The official narrative frames migration as a security threat, a cultural challenge, or an economic burden. But beneath this surface lies a deeper contradiction: the very system that benefits from global inequality also criminalizes its consequences.
The modern global economy is built on outsourcing labor to low-wage countries while simultaneously closing borders to the people behind that labor. Western countries demand cheap products—from cars and clothes to electronics—but refuse to pay the true human cost. As a result, millions are forced to migrate not out of free will, but from structural necessity.
Eidoism proposes a radical reframe: migration is not a problem. It is a symptom. And the cure lies not in border control, but in correcting the global value distribution that drives people to flee in the first place.
The Core of the Problem: Wage Arbitrage and Structural Injustice
In today’s global economy, the value of labor is not determined by what a person needs to live a dignified life. It’s determined by how cheaply their work can be bought.
- The US outsources car manufacturing to Mexico, paying workers a fraction of US wages.
- European fashion brands produce in Bangladesh, where a month’s salary often buys a week’s worth of food.
- Western tech giants use African cobalt mined by children for pennies per hour.
These practices are not accidents. They are structural. By exploiting wage differentials between countries, companies maximize profit margins while externalizing responsibility.
Yet when the people from these very countries try to move north—for safety, education, or opportunity—they are blocked. The same system that welcomes their labor violently rejects their presence.
The Eidoist Response: A Form-Based Global Salary Model
Eidoism challenges the illusion that more growth, more trade, or more development aid can solve this. Instead, it identifies a deeper flaw: the loop of recognition—where status, power, and accumulation override structural human needs.
To break this loop, Eidoism introduces the Form-Based Value (FBV) Global Salary Model—a salary standard based not on market logic or competition, but on the cost of dignified structural participation in each local context.
How the FBV Model Works
1. Local Structural Participation Index (LSPI)
Each country calculates its own FBV base salary using local data:
- Housing (safe, functional shelter)
- Nutrition (healthy diet, clean water)
- Healthcare (basic and emergency access)
- Mobility (transport)
- Communication (phone and internet)
- Education (basic skill participation)
- Identity and administration (access to institutions)
- Emergency buffer (10%)
This results in a localized monthly salary that reflects what a person needs to fully participate in their society—not survive, not compete, but function in form.
2. Global Equality Add-On
To avoid creating a two-tier world where poor countries are “kept alive” while rich nations enjoy prosperity, Eidoism adds a Global Adjustment Credit:
- Funded through a Global Equalization Pool sourced from taxes on excess profits, multinational extractions, and voluntary redistribution.
- Disbursed as a monthly income top-up in developing countries, enabling people to access global tools, technologies, or savings—not luxury, but prosperity in structure.
- Allows locals to stay, grow, and innovate without needing to migrate.
Effects on Migration
🌱 1. Ends Forced Migration
When a Vietnamese tailor, Guatemalan farmer, or Nigerian engineer earns enough to live and thrive in place, they no longer need to leave their community to access basic life possibilities.
🌍 2. Migration Becomes Optional, Not Desperate
People may still migrate—for cultural exchange, relationships, or projects—but not to escape economic despair.
🧭 3. Reverse Aspirational Flow
Under this model, prosperity flows both ways. Western nations may learn from low-cost, high-form solutions created in the Global South. The obsession with copying the West fades.
Global Price Realignment
When companies are required to pay the FBV salary for every worker in the supply chain:
- The illusion of cheap products disappears.
- Consumers see the real value behind goods.
- Fast fashion, disposable tech, and artificial “affordable luxury” vanish—replaced by longer-lasting, form-based goods.
- Global wages begin to converge, not through forced migration, but through ethical parity.
Criticism and Safeguards
❓ “This will kill jobs in poor countries.”
No—it will kill exploitative jobs. What remains will be work that sustains life in dignity.
❓ “How is it enforced?”
- Through blockchain-verified smart contracts
- Global audit trails
- Consumer-driven verification (Eidoist Seal of Form, not fame)
❓ “Isn’t this just another top-down system?”
No. Each country sets its own LSPI based on real-world costs. It is a bottom-up reconstruction, with no central control over what counts as dignity.
Final Reflection: Toward Global Equality Without Colonial Dreams
People follow the dream of prosperity. That dream is not wrong—it is human. But in the current system, it is weaponized. The only way to achieve prosperity is to leave, to compete, or to submit.
The FBV Global Salary Model reframes this dream. It does not suppress ambition. It grounds it. It says:
“Yes, you deserve to live well. But not by displacing others, not by chasing symbols, and not by selling your soul. You deserve to live well where you are, with your family, your land, your language—and your form intact.”
This is not utopia. It is structure. And in the age of collapse, structure is revolutionary.
Eidoism does not promise equality through revolution.
It proposes clarity through reconstruction.
Prosperity without domination.
Migration without desperation.
A world not built on winners and losers, but on form over fame.That is what the FBV salary protects. That is how we end migration as tragedy—and begin mobility as mutual recognition.
