The future of Russian-Chinese relations within BRICS is defined by a strategic convergence: Russia’s pivot eastward after the rupture with Europe and China’s ambition to re-shape global governance. Energy trade, technology cooperation, and financial integration are binding the two powers into a pragmatic partnership, even as underlying asymmetries and competing interests remain. Within BRICS, their coordination strengthens calls for a multipolar world order and accelerates the bloc’s expansion into new markets. Yet the partnership is not without limits—dependence, mistrust, and global headwinds could expose fault lines. The next two decades will test whether BRICS becomes a cohesive platform for alternative global leadership, or merely a loose forum shaped by shifting national priorities.

Lesen Sie weiter

The Iranian nuclear conflict cannot be understood solely through the lens of technology and security. Enrichment levels and missile ranges matter, but they are not the real drivers of escalation. At its core, Iran’s pursuit of the bomb is about the Demand for Recognition (DfR) — the need to be acknowledged as sovereign, equal, and immune to humiliation. Each sanction, each Israeli or U.S. strike, has deepened Iran’s resolve rather than weakened it. The atomic bomb represents not just deterrence, but dignity: a symbolic victory in a struggle for respect on the world stage. If Iran crosses the nuclear threshold, the West must abandon denial and coercion. Only through recognition-based diplomacy can confrontation be transformed into stability.

Lesen Sie weiter

Ein eskalierender Konflikt in der Ostsee hat zu einem nie dagewesenen militärischen Patt geführt, da die europäischen Seestreitkräfte Sanktionen durchsetzen und russische Öltanker unter internationaler Flagge mit Marinebegleitung fahren. Dieses Szenario verdeutlicht, wie das Streben nach symbolischer Dominanz und Anerkennungsschleifen die für die Stabilität erforderliche Strukturform aufbricht und militärische Konfrontationen, wirtschaftliche Störungen und ökologische Schäden riskiert. Der Eidoismus fordert eine Rückkehr zur strukturellen Rationalität, die gemeinsamen Bedürfnissen, Deeskalation und formgebundenen Lösungen den Vorrang vor statusbezogener Eskalation einräumt.

Lesen Sie weiter

nach oben
de_DE