When vision and hearing are absent, intelligence does not disappear—symbols do. DeafBlind cognition reveals how meaning and thought arise before language.

Learning begins with prediction failure. When expected states do not occur, Prediction Feedback (PF) gates learning by shifting the system from exploitation to exploration. What stabilizes are not symbols, but predictive constraints—invariants that reliably reduce uncertainty across interaction. These constraints form functional ontologies: commitments about how the world behaves under action.

Thought is not inner speech. It is the serial traversal of stabilized ontological constraints, enabling internal simulation, comparison, and planning. In DeafBlind cognition, this traversal is tactile–motor; in hearing cognition, language may annotate it. Language does not generate thought.

Language is a structured, shared symbolic system that binds and transmits already-formed ontologies across individuals and generations. It enables society and collective intelligence, but it is not the biological source of meaning.

This ordering—prediction before symbol, ontology before language—has direct implications for AI. Biologically aligned intelligence must begin with embodied prediction and PF-gated ontology formation; language, if added, should function as an interface, not as a substrate.

Lesen Sie weiter

Why do we become the particular persons we are, rather than any of the countless alternatives we might have been? This question precedes morality, psychology, and law. It is asked whenever we judge, diagnose, forgive, or punish. Yet most answers assume that identity is chosen, inherited as character, or consciously learned. This essay argues otherwise. Human identity emerges before intention, self-reflection, or moral reasoning exist. During early development, the brain passively accumulates associations and stabilizes them through Prediction Feedback (PF), a pre-conscious signal of predictive coherence. The resulting noetic horizon silently defines what feels natural, possible, and “like oneself.” Within this framework, crime and so-called perversions are not moral failures or genetic defects but intelligible outcomes of how identity stabilizes under unbalanced PF conditions. We are not the authors of who we are; we are the outcome of what once made our inner world coherent.

Lesen Sie weiter

Despite unprecedented global connectivity, modern societies are experiencing rising polarization, nationalism, and everyday cultural conflict. This essay argues that these tensions are not driven by ignorance, moral failure, or technological fear, but by a structural imbalance between the speed of change and the capacity of cultures to maintain shared expectations. The internet and artificial intelligence amplify dominant global reference frames without providing mechanisms for local integration, creating cultural compression and loss of predictability in daily life. In response, “Me First” politics and renewed nationalism emerge as rational stabilization strategies rather than ideological regressions. Understanding this dynamic reframes contemporary conflict as a systems-design problem—one that requires respecting cultural boundaries and integration limits if global cooperation is to remain viable.

Lesen Sie weiter

Happiness is not a goal the brain actively pursues, nor is unhappiness a reliable trigger for self-improvement. In a Predictive Feedback (PF) framework, happiness emerges when prediction error is low and stable—when the system no longer needs to escalate corrective effort. Unhappiness, by contrast, appears in two fundamentally different regimes: PF escalation, which produces anxiety, restlessness, and motivation to change; and PF collapse, in which persistent, unsolvable prediction error leads to withdrawal, apathy, and the loss of initiative commonly labeled depression. The widespread belief that suffering should automatically generate growth reflects a category error. Motivation depends not on negative feeling, but on whether PF still judges prediction as solvable. Depression is therefore not failed happiness-seeking, but predictive disengagement.

Lesen Sie weiter

The Demand for Recognition (DfR) proposes that the human brain’s fundamental learning and motivational drive arises from the need to gain and preserve recognition. Yet the concept itself triggers powerful resistance — both individually and collectively.
Like an immune system protecting the ego’s integrity, the mind instinctively rejects awareness of DfR because it reveals the hidden engine behind moral judgment, reasoning, and identity.
This self-defensive blindness extends into science, where recognition structures—peer review, citation, prestige—govern behavior while denying their emotional basis.
Paradoxically, the rejection of DfR by individuals and institutions confirms its validity: it behaves exactly as the theory predicts.
The theorist’s own awareness of DfR, and the doubt that this awareness might be narcissistic self-pleasure, represent the final loop of the mechanism—a recognition system recognizing itself.
Integrating DfR consciously does not destroy human autonomy; it redefines it as the capacity to navigate recognition rather than to deny it.

Lesen Sie weiter

Modern society is built on an invisible law: the Demand for Recognition. Elites—political leaders, financial warriors, corporate deal makers—seek recognition through dominance. The masses, though equally bound by the same drive, find it in obedience and belonging. Together they form an unequal exchange where recognition outweighs reason, justice, and even survival. Eidoism reveals this hidden architecture, showing why humanity repeatedly sacrifices its future for prestige, loyalty, and power. Awareness of this mechanism is the first step toward freedom.

Lesen Sie weiter

The Gaza conflict is not unsolved because leaders lack clever plans, but because human brains are wired to turn every plan into a battlefield for dignity. Israel and the U.S. want closure through decisive control, Hamas thrives on endless struggle, international do-gooders seek moral recognition, and the Palestinian people remain victims caught between these forces. The hidden mechanism is the Demand for Recognition (DfR) — an unconscious neural bias that bends every prediction of “what to do next” toward preserving pride and avoiding humiliation. As long as DfR drives decision-making, Gaza will remain trapped in a cycle of violence, where strength creates erasure, resistance creates survival, and peace is always postponed.

Lesen Sie weiter

The Iranian nuclear conflict cannot be understood solely through the lens of technology and security. Enrichment levels and missile ranges matter, but they are not the real drivers of escalation. At its core, Iran’s pursuit of the bomb is about the Demand for Recognition (DfR) — the need to be acknowledged as sovereign, equal, and immune to humiliation. Each sanction, each Israeli or U.S. strike, has deepened Iran’s resolve rather than weakened it. The atomic bomb represents not just deterrence, but dignity: a symbolic victory in a struggle for respect on the world stage. If Iran crosses the nuclear threshold, the West must abandon denial and coercion. Only through recognition-based diplomacy can confrontation be transformed into stability.

Lesen Sie weiter

The Trump–Putin summit in Alaska was less a negotiation than a carefully staged theater of recognition. Every detail—the red carpet, the mirrored limousines, Trump’s clapping hands, Putin’s stoic silence—served not to strike a deal but to exchange respect before a global audience. Trust was built not through treaties but through symbolic gestures: Putin trusted he would not be assassinated or arrested; Trump trusted he would not be embarrassed in public. The photographs were the true outcome of the summit—recognition tokens that conferred legitimacy, status, and respect far beyond any policy result.

Lesen Sie weiter

The case of the World Journal of Neuroscience—which demanded a $999 fee before even sending a manuscript to peer review—reveals how deeply scientific publishing has turned into an industry of recognition and vanity. What should be a neutral exchange of knowledge has become a marketplace of prestige tokens, sold to authors under career pressure and monetized by journals and universities alike. In this economy, recognition is the currency, while truth risks becoming the ornament.

Lesen Sie weiter

nach oben
de_DE