Nations are not held together by shared beliefs or unanimous agreement. They remain stable because citizens develop a shared sense of reality—a common set of expectations about what is real, what consequences will follow actions, and which futures are plausible. This sense of reality operates below ideology and opinion and is reinforced through institutions, rituals, and social consequences. The public return of North Korean soldiers from foreign deployment illustrates how societies actively repair and stabilize these shared expectations, absorbing potentially disruptive experiences into a coherent national order rather than allowing them to fracture it.

Tiếp tục đọc

Human personality does not originate in moral choice or conscious reasoning. Long before the brain can think symbolically, it evaluates. From birth, inherited neural comparators continuously distinguish comfort from discomfort, safety from threat, and coherence from instability. These evaluations regulate early prediction patterns through Predictive Feedback (PF), while emotions function as broadcast signals of the brain’s internal regulatory state—coordinating action internally and communicating condition externally.

During early childhood, repeated emotional and social interactions calibrate these comparators and stabilize specific predictive pathways. This process shapes the developing prefrontal cortex and biases how the individual later restores internal balance. What societies eventually label as “good” or “bad” personality traits are not moral properties encoded in the brain, but observable outcomes of this early regulatory development. Understanding personality in this way shifts the question from judgment to development, and from ethics to neurobiological regulation.

Tiếp tục đọc

Structural neuroimaging consistently reveals small but statistically significant differences in average brain morphology across human populations. These findings are often misinterpreted as evidence of inherent cognitive or behavioral divergence. This essay argues that such inferences are technically invalid. Macro-scale brain measures—such as volume, cortical thickness, and white matter integrity—operate within a functional vacuum: they lack a reliable causal mapping to cognition or behavior. Cognitive capacity arises not from physical bulk, but from the brain’s semantic–associative architecture and its regulation by internal Prediction Feedback. Observed structural differences are therefore best understood as biomarkers of environmental and socioeconomic disparity, not determinants of intelligence or behavioral potential.

Tiếp tục đọc

Love is not an emotion in the classical or neuroscientific sense, nor is it a hormone-driven state or a learned social script. Within a Predictive Feedback (PF)–based model of cognition, love emerges as a resonance phenomenon: a self-stabilizing loop between sustained positive PF and its rendering in perceptual awareness. Emotions, in this framework, are blind, non-directed broadcasts of the organism’s current mental state, implemented through inherited physiological patterns and recognized by equally inherited perceptual comparators. Feelings arise only when awareness interprets these broadcasts using learned entities and contextual associations. Love, therefore, is neither broadcast nor comparator output, but a persistent PF-positive resonance that awareness repeatedly reifies as a coherent feeling. When prediction confirmation collapses, love dissolves—not because an emotion has ended, but because the PF resonance that sustained the feeling has broken.

Tiếp tục đọc

The brain does not seek truth—it seeks resonance.
We understand only what matches our internal architecture of associations.
When two minds resonate within different architectures, they believe they understand while actually confirming only themselves.
This is the deepest illusion of culture: that shared language equals shared meaning.
True understanding begins not with empathy, but with neural alignment—the slow reconstruction of matching associations through lived experience.

Tiếp tục đọc

Prevailing theories in neuroscience explain learning and motivation through reward, drive reduction, or utility maximization. This article challenges that framework by introducing the Demand for Recognition (DfR) as the true root mechanism. DfR is an inherited limbic loop that continuously evaluates feedback in binary terms—comfortable or uncomfortable—modulates plasticity, and sustains self-learning. Unlike AI, which requires externally imposed recognition surrogates, the human brain self-learns because DfR ensures constant adjustment to recognition signals. Reframing recognition as fundamental and reward as secondary unifies perspectives from neuroscience, psychology, AI, and evolutionary theory, setting the stage for broad interdisciplinary debate.
I claim that no self-learning system can exist without recognition. Brains achieve adaptation by minimizing recognition deficits. AI, by contrast, adapts only through external recognition surrogates imposed by developers. Reframing DfR as the fundamental driver of cognition challenges current reward-centric models.

Tiếp tục đọc

While classical entropy describes the universe’s descent into disorder, Evolutionary Entropy reveals its hidden counter-force: the selective collapse of chaos into form. In open systems, where energy flows and selection occurs, only configurations that persist and cohere remain. Evolutionary Entropy is the scientific backbone of Eidoism — the law by which Form survives.

Tiếp tục đọc

lên đầu trang
vi