This essay examines how communist movements around the world diverged from classical Marxist theory, revealing instead a pattern of pragmatic nationalism and personal recognition-seeking by revolutionary elites. From Lenin to Ho Chi Minh, Mao to Castro, most leaders did not emerge from the working class but from educated, privileged backgrounds. Eidoism interprets these revolutions as expressions of a deeper recognition loop—where personal ambition, moral narcissism, and the desire for historical legacy re-coded revolutionary ideology into a stage for performance, rather than a path to true equality or form.

Tiếp tục đọc

The feud between Elon Musk and Donald Trump is more than a clash of personalities—it’s a structural collision of two recognition loops. Musk, driven by the need to be seen as a genius innovator, may sacrifice business interests to defend his identity. Trump, addicted to domination and loyalty, seeks total submission from rivals. This essay explores how their conflicting psychological structures fuel an escalating cycle of emotional escalation and performative destruction—with no off-ramp in sight.

Tiếp tục đọc

Communism began as a radical promise to liberate the oppressed and abolish exploitation, but over time, its revolutionary ideals gave way to economic pragmatism. From Marx’s vision to Lenin’s vanguard, Mao’s peasant uprising, and Ho Chi Minh’s anti-colonial socialism, the movement evolved—and eventually adapted capitalist tools to maintain power. Today, post-communist societies no longer define success by equality, but by growth, visibility, and consumption. This essay explores how the original vision was not abandoned, but absorbed—reshaped by structural realities and the deeper human hunger for recognition.

Tiếp tục đọc

The public fallout between Donald Trump and Elon Musk is more than a clash of egos—it is a revealing example of how the demand for recognition drives behavior at the highest levels of power. This essay explores how political leaders, like Musk and Trump, operate within unconscious recognition loops that distort diplomacy, escalate conflict, and threaten global stability. Beneath policy lies performance, and beneath performance lies a fragile psychological need to be seen. Eidoism exposes this structure and offers a path beyond ego-driven governance.

Tiếp tục đọc

As global hegemony fractures, the world faces not a peaceful transition but a chaotic collapse of legitimacy, meaning, and recognition. The old order—once held together by belief, military dominance, and economic dependence—is unraveling from within. New powers rise, not to unify, but to divide. In this vacuum, people no longer trust the system or each other. The deeper crisis is not geopolitical, but psychological: the implosion of the recognition loop that kept individuals aligned with hegemonic forms. This essay explores the mechanisms of hegemony, its mutation into digital control, and the possibility of post-hegemonic societies grounded in form rather than performance.

Tiếp tục đọc

The Recognition-Driven War Probability (RDWP) Model redefines how we assess the likelihood of conflict by incorporating a nation’s unconscious collective demand for recognition. Centered on the ratio of military spending to GDP, the model reveals how symbolic identity, domestic pressure, and perceived threats combine to shape strategic behavior. Use cases across diverse nations—from the U.S. to Saudi Arabia—demonstrate how recognition-seeking, more than pure strategic interest, predicts the probability of war in the 21st century.

Tiếp tục đọc

This essay explores the hidden mechanics behind recent U.S. political actions—visa bans on Chinese students, the attack on Harvard University, and the court’s block on Trump’s tariffs—through the lens of Eidoism. It reveals how institutions that appear to act from legal or structural principles are increasingly driven by the demand for recognition. What looks like constitutional governance or national defense is often a symbolic performance. In a system dominated by appearance and political theater, form survives only as a mask. Until the loop of recognition is exposed, true structure cannot re-emerge.

Tiếp tục đọc

This essay proposes a fundamental shift in understanding the roots of human violence. Rather than viewing war, aggression, and conflict as consequences of resource scarcity or ideology alone, it frames the “culture of violence” as the inevitable product of the human brain’s demand for recognition. Drawing on neuroscientific and social theory, it argues that all external risk factors—leadership, propaganda, technology, or economic conditions—are merely modifiers of recognition demand. Through detailed analysis and case studies, including the Ukraine war, the essay reveals how recognition loops, amplified by leaders and cultural narratives, can override even the most advanced cognitive and institutional safeguards, fueling violence on both individual and societal scales.

Tiếp tục đọc

Western media and politicians routinely condemn Russia and China for human rights abuses and authoritarian practices—but their critiques often fail to achieve real impact. This essay explores why: beneath the surface, deep neuroscientific differences in cultural wiring make true understanding and effective criticism almost impossible. Using examples from everyday life in Russia and China, we reveal how Western criticism “backs form,” misunderstanding local recognition patterns and reinforcing division instead of fostering change. Eidoism offers a new lens—urging humility, dialogue, and the recognition that only internal cultural shifts can drive real transformation.

Tiếp tục đọc

Một cuộc xung đột leo thang ở Biển Baltic đã dẫn đến những cuộc đối đầu quân sự chưa từng có, khi hải quân châu Âu hành động để thực thi lệnh trừng phạt và tàu chở dầu của Nga đi dưới cờ quốc tế với sự hộ tống của hải quân. Kịch bản này nêu bật cách theo đuổi sự thống trị mang tính biểu tượng và các vòng lặp công nhận đang phá vỡ hình thức cấu trúc cần thiết cho sự ổn định, gây nguy cơ đối đầu quân sự, gián đoạn kinh tế và tác hại sinh thái. Chủ nghĩa Eido kêu gọi quay trở lại với tính hợp lý về mặt cấu trúc—ưu tiên các nhu cầu chung, giảm leo thang và các giải pháp dựa trên hình thức hơn là leo thang theo tình trạng.

Tiếp tục đọc

lên đầu trang
vi