Marxism - Eidoism

Chia sẻFacebookTwitter-mớiTumblrPinterest

Why Classical, Keynesian, and Marxist Economics Are All Wrong

For centuries, Classical, Keynesian, and Marxist economists have tried to explain human behavior in markets, yet all missed the true engine of economics: the Demand for Recognition (DfR). Classical theory reduced motivation to “self-interest,” Keynes focused on stabilizing demand, and Marx blamed class ownership. But each remained blind to the fact that recognition — not money, not survival — is the endless scarcity driving consumption, production, growth, and crisis. Eidoism reframes economics as the study of recognition flows, revealing why bubbles form, why inequality persists, and why no system achieves equilibrium. Without Eidoism, economics is a science of surfaces; with it, it becomes a human science that can finally address the root of instability.

Tiếp tục đọc

Chia sẻFacebookTwitter-mớiTumblrPinterest

Communist Leaders Were Never Working Class

This essay examines how communist movements around the world diverged from classical Marxist theory, revealing instead a pattern of pragmatic nationalism and personal recognition-seeking by revolutionary elites. From Lenin to Ho Chi Minh, Mao to Castro, most leaders did not emerge from the working class but from educated, privileged backgrounds. Eidoism interprets these revolutions as expressions of a deeper recognition loop—where personal ambition, moral narcissism, and the desire for historical legacy re-coded revolutionary ideology into a stage for performance, rather than a path to true equality or form.

Tiếp tục đọc

Tháng 6 6, 2025 Tín hiệu sụp đổ / Gương điện

Chia sẻFacebookTwitter-mớiTumblrPinterest

The Evolution from Socialist Ideals to Market Economies

Communism began as a radical promise to liberate the oppressed and abolish exploitation, but over time, its revolutionary ideals gave way to economic pragmatism. From Marx’s vision to Lenin’s vanguard, Mao’s peasant uprising, and Ho Chi Minh’s anti-colonial socialism, the movement evolved—and eventually adapted capitalist tools to maintain power. Today, post-communist societies no longer define success by equality, but by growth, visibility, and consumption. This essay explores how the original vision was not abandoned, but absorbed—reshaped by structural realities and the deeper human hunger for recognition.

Tiếp tục đọc

Tháng 5 27, 2025 Biểu mẫu kinh tế / Phá vỡ hình thức

Chia sẻFacebookTwitter-mớiTumblrPinterest

Why No Society Escapes Oligarchy, Collapse, or Exploitation

Every attempt to build a fair society—from revolutionary socialism to modern capitalist reforms—has been undone by a deeper, rarely recognized force: the demand for recognition. Rooted in human evolution, this neural drive for status and validation creates new elites and hierarchies, no matter how wealth and power are redistributed. Like the tragic experiments of “mouse utopia,” where abundance led not to harmony but to social collapse, human societies become trapped in cycles of competition, exclusion, and breakdown. The only path to lasting fairness is not another structural reform, but a cultural shift: widespread awareness of the recognition loop and a new way of valuing form, contribution, and humility over endless status-seeking.

Tiếp tục đọc